"'We should not have gone to war knowing the information that we know today,' Kerry told ABC. 'Knowing there was no imminent threat to America, knowing there were no weapons of mass destruction, knowing there was no connection of Saddam Hussein to Al Qaida, I would not have gone to war. That's plain and simple.'"

So, once again, the Senator says that he would not have taken this country to war if: A) he had won an election that he didn't even run in, B) had knowledge that it was impossible to have at the time. Somehow implying that he would have done better.

Is he trying to convince someone that he is clairvoyant? What's the deal?